12
2006
Doing bytecode Kungfu with Javassist
Came across a situation today where I need to mock out a static method on one of Websphere’s classes to simulate a certain test case. Normally this kind of bad boy is pretty tricky since you’ve either got to wrap the vendor’s class with your own injectable wrapper, or provide your own impl for their interface. The call in question was:
WSSubject.getCallerSubject();
with WSSubject being a static and final class for good measure. No mocking of the interface possible, no subclassing tricks available; I thought it might be time to check out what is achievable with the various bytecode manipulation libraries to see if I could just change the single method I was interested in. Had a look at ASM and BCEL, and found myself in way too deep in bytecode semantics. In the end I came across Javassist which was at just the right level. Worked my way through the tutorial and I was good to go.
As long as you get to the class before the classloader does, you can go crazy: add methods, substitute in your own methods, add before and after interceptors, change field visibility, the whole nine yards. So I put in a little block in my test case’s static initialiser to hook myself into the process:
static {
try { ClassPool cp = ClassPool.getDefault(); CtClass cc = cp.get("com.ibm.websphere.security.auth.WSSubject"); CtMethod subjMethod = cc.getDeclaredMethod("getCallerSubject"); subjMethod.setBody(cp.get(MyTest.class.getName()).getDeclaredMethod("getCallerSubject"), null); cc.toClass(); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); }
}
Grab a handle to the WSSubject class, grab a handle to the getCallerSubject() method, then use that setBody() call to insert your own method body in the mix. In my case, I call the getCallerSubject() on my test class to manufacture my own subject to return. Two words: Sen Sational.
Would probably have been a lot easier wrap the getSubject() call in my own injectable class, but it’s handy to know that all sorts of bytecode kungfu is possible if your motivated.
Big props to Javassist dudes.
1 Comment + Add Comment
Leave a comment
Glen Smith
Archives
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- January 2011
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003

An article by Glen





As this is still referenced in some other posts, I feel PowerMock (a mocking framework, that supports mocking static methods) should be pointed out here: code.google.com/p/powermock